Hi-Speed Internet by Satellite?

What are the options for those living “outside the grid,” those that need internet service in rural areas?  One option is home satellite internet service.  Many satellite internet companies focus on agricultural sectors as they tend to be underserved in terms of wired services.  The challenge Satellite internet service providers face is that their customers’ information is downloaded in bursts, so anything requiring real-time updates (VoIP, online games, instant messaging) will be problematic.  Also with satellite, good service is weather dependent.  Clouds and rainy weather can cause dropped connections and slow speeds.  Satellite also tends to be more expensive than conventional wireless services.  Although it is impressive to consider the deployment of broadband from outer space, satellite technology provides significantly lesser levels of total bandwidth to its users.  Should a satellite customer exceed their contractual usage limits, the consequence are speeds being reduced to dial up levels for as much as three days.  So while satellite companies may be advertising central coast internet solutions, depending on your usage, it may not be the best solution.

Posted in Razzolink Technology, Satellite vs. WiMax | Leave a comment

The Ever-Hungry Broadband Monster

Broadband usage among Internet users is up 60% since 2009.  Why?  In North America, Netflix is now 29.7% of peak downstream traffic and has become the largest source of Internet traffic overall.   Currently, Real-Time Entertainment applications consume 49.2% of peak aggregate traffic, this number is expected to reach 55-60% by the end of 2011 (http://venturebeat.com/2011/05/17/netflix-north-america-traffi/).

What does it all mean?  A few years ago, a user might have downloaded a few You Tube clips, now users download movies, play real-time video games…all of which require bandwidth exceeding what was once sufficient.  As the applications require more, users need more.  This forces providers to keep up with rapidly changing customer demand.

Often customers don’t realize that the problems they are having with their speeds are merely the result of having insufficient bandwidth.  A service package that was just fine when they signed up 4 years ago may not cut it anymore, given what most people are using the Internet for these days.   The cheapest broadband internet service may be that simply because it can’t meet the needs that a more expensive package can.

If this sounds like you, please call our office.  We have many packages to fit your needs if you find you have outgrown your service!

 

Posted in Razzolink Technology | Leave a comment

The Plight of the Rural Internet User

In today’s world, fast internet service is no longer a luxury but rather a necessity.  This poses a problem for residents living in rural areas where options are fewer than for those living in a larger metropolitan area.  The problem comes down to one of numbers; basically it is the density of homes in a given area.

Wired vs. Wireless

The challenge for “wired” providers such as AT&T (DSL), Comcast or Charter (cable modem) is the cost to build their wired infrastructure into less populated communities.  The price of fiber per mile requires a certain density in order to justify a provider’s willingness to build their telecom plant or upgrade their existing plant to support broadband service.  If compared to a city like San Francisco, where you may have nearly 500 homes per plant mile as opposed to Monterey County where in general, the county allows for one home per 5 acre parcel, the need for a more affordable delivery network becomes essential.  The revenue generated does not warrant the cost of establishing a wired network for companies who provide DSL and cable options.  For those living outside the DSL and cable grid, wireless becomes the most effective solution for the provider and the customer.

Investment in the Rural Customer

Wireless service also necessitates some infrastructure, but for smaller providers, this investment allows rural residents the opportunity to enjoy internet comparable (and sometimes superior) to that of wired-service recipients.  Offering high speed internet for rural areas allows smaller providers (like Razzolink) to invest in the community in ways that larger providers don’t appreciate.

The good news?  Rural high speed internet options are increasing by the day, and so is competition, and where there is competition there are better options for the consumer!

Posted in Razzolink Technology | Leave a comment